Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309544›Full record

ReviewPsychiatry research communications2024

Can atypical antipsychotics alleviate Deficits in psychosocial impairments in patients with a diagnosis of Borderline Personality? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Katie Griffiths, Nadezhda Velichkova, Lisa Quadt, Jimena Berni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychiatry research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katie GriffithsDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, UK.
Nadezhda VelichkovaDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, UK.
Lisa QuadtDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, UK.
Jimena BerniDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with a diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) often experience difficulties in psychosocial functioning, which reduces the ability of individuals to engage socially. This review seeks to determine whether atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) are more effective than placebo at alleviating these difficulties in adults with a diagnosis of BPD. We identified six Randomized Control Trials, conducted between 1994 and 2024, with 1012 patients that were treated with either: Olanzapine, Quetiapine, Ziprasidone or Aripiprazole. Using a meta-analysis, we found evidence that atypical antipsychotics induce a small improvement treating psychosocial functioning in patients with a diagnosis of border line personality. In particular, AAPs improved General Assessment of Functioning (GAF) more than placebo. Combining GAFs P-values from several studies indicated this effect was significant. AAPs were also superior to placebo at improving quality of interpersonal relationships, occupational functioning and family life. There was a positive improvement tendency in social life and leisure activities. AAPs also induced known secondary effects like weight gain and sedation as previously described. AAPs were beneficial for improving general functioning and its subcomponents. However, the magnitude of the benefit above that of placebo was small and its clinical meaningfulness is thus debatable. More randomised-controlled trials are required.

Identifiers

PMID39309544
PMCPMC11413517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.