Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309478›Full record

ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2024

Level of Compliance with Spanish Guideline Recommendations in the Management of Asthma.

Lorena Piñel Jimenez, Álvaro Martinez Mesa, Esther Sanchez Alvarez, Javier Lopez Garcia, Ana Aguilar Galvez, Nuria Reina Marfil, Belen Gómez Rodríguez, Eva Cabrera Cesar, Jose Luis Velasco Garrido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lorena Piñel JimenezDepartment of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Álvaro Martinez MesaDepartment of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Esther Sanchez AlvarezDepartment of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Javier Lopez GarciaDepartment of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Ana Aguilar GalvezDepartment of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Nuria Reina MarfilDepartment of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Belen Gómez RodríguezDepartment of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Eva Cabrera CesarDepartment of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Jose Luis Velasco GarridoDepartment of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical management of asthmatic patients and the level of compliance with the Materials and Methods: Descriptive, cross-sectional study in asthma patients from the Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital influential area, Málaga (Spain). Asthma Control Test (ACT) results, demographic and clinical characteristics, and GEMA indicators of quality asthma care were obtained from each participating patient. Results: Two hundred and eighty-eight patients (64.2% woman, mean age 48.6 years) were included in the study. The evaluation of the level of compliance with the GEMA quality indicators showed that in 20.8% of the patients the diagnosis of asthma was confirmed by spirometry and bronchodilator test, and 52.5% of the patients with suspicion of allergic asthma performed a sensitization test. Among the smoker patients, 76.3% were recommended to stop smoking; 14.2% of the patients received a paper-based educational plan. Regarding asthma treatment, 92.3% of patients with persistent asthma received inhaled glucocorticoids (IGC). IGC and LABA were the most common treatments for asthma, used in combination (ICG + LABA) in 139 (48.3%) patients; 32.6% discontinued SABA treatment during the study period. Asthma was well controlled in 54.9% of the patients (ACT score ≥20), and 13.9% of the patients registered exacerbations during the previous year with a mean (SD) of 1.38 (0.74) events. Conclusion: Most of the GEMA quality indicators of asthma care are not followed in real-world clinical practice. Specialists select the best option among the available treatments but there is an unmet need for training plans in other relevant aspects, such as diagnosis and/or disease monitoring.

Indexed as

asthmaasthma controlasthma managementclinical guidelinescompliance with guidelinesindicators of quality care

Identifiers

PMID39309478
PMCPMC11414629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.