ArticleeNeurologicalSci2024
Evaluation of nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell complex changes in patients with migraine using optical coherence tomography.
Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical coherence tomography is a useful tool for monitoring treatment response in migraine: a prospective longitudinal study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Retinal connections to migraine.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze changes in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness in migraine patients with and without aura compared to healthy controls and to identify factors influencing the occurrence of these anomalies. Methods: This is a cross-sectional case-control study including migraine patients and control subjects. All patients and controls underwent a complete ophthalmological examination, RNFL and GCC thickness measurements using a spectral domain-OCT device.The duration of migraine, the frequency and duration of migraine attacks, the migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) and migraine severity scale (MIGSEV) questionnaire scores were recorded. Results: One hundred and twenty eyes from 60 patients (60 eyes in the migraine without aura (MWoA) group and 60 eyes in the migraine with aura (MWA) group) were included. Control group included 30 age and gender matched healthy participants (60 eyes). OCT revealed that RNFL and GCC thickness were significantly reduced in the migraine without aura (MWoA) and in the migraine with aura (MWA) groups compared to the control group and in the migraine with aura (MWA) group compared to the migraine without aura (MWoA) group. Prolonged disease duration was associated to decreased GCC thickness. RNFL and GCC thickness were correlated to disease severity, attack frequency and duration. In the multivariate study, duration of migraine and attack frequency were the main determinant factors of nasal GCC thickness. Disease severity was the main determinant of RNFL and GCC thickness, with the exception of the nasal sector. Conclusion: Our study emphasize the significant impact of both types of migraine on retinal structures. OCT would serve as a valuable biomarker in migraine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.