Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309413›Full record

ArticleNational science review2024

Significant chlorine emissions from biomass burning affect the long-term atmospheric chemistry in Asia.

Di Chang, Qinyi Li, Zhe Wang, Jianing Dai, Xiao Fu, Jia Guo, Lei Zhu, Dongchuan Pu, Carlos A Cuevas, Rafael P Fernandez and 10 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in National science review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Long-term PMAtmospheric pollution research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Di ChangAtmospheric Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz 55128, Germany.
Qinyi LiDepartment of Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate, Institute of Physical Chemistry Blas Cabrera, CSIC, Madrid 28006, Spain.
Zhe WangDivision of Environment and Sustainability, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5627-6562
Jianing DaiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Xiao FuDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Jia GuoEnvironmental Central Facility, Institute for the Environment, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Lei ZhuAtmospheric Chemistry Modeling & Remote Sensing Research Group, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3919-3095
Dongchuan PuAtmospheric Chemistry Modeling & Remote Sensing Research Group, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China.
Carlos A CuevasDepartment of Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate, Institute of Physical Chemistry Blas Cabrera, CSIC, Madrid 28006, Spain.
Rafael P FernandezInstitute for Interdisciplinary Science (ICB), National Research Council (CONICET), FCEN-UNCuyo, Mendoza 5501, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4114-5500
Weigang WangInstitute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6911-1110
Maofa GeInstitute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Jimmy C H FungDivision of Environment and Sustainability, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Alexis K H LauDivision of Environment and Sustainability, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Claire GranierNOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory/CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80305, USA.
Guy BrasseurDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China.
Andrea PozzerAtmospheric Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz 55128, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2440-6104
Alfonso Saiz-LopezDepartment of Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate, Institute of Physical Chemistry Blas Cabrera, CSIC, Madrid 28006, Spain.
Yu SongState Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2455-2999
Tao WangDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomass burning (BB) is a major source of trace gases and particles in the atmosphere, influencing air quality, radiative balance, and climate. Previous studies have mainly focused on the BB emissions of carbon and nitrogen species with less attention on chlorine. Reactive chlorine chemistry has significant effects on atmospheric chemistry and air quality. However, quantitative information on chlorine emissions from BB, particularly the long-term trend and associated atmospheric impacts, is limited both on regional and global scales. Here, we report a long-term (2001-2018) high-resolution BB emission inventory for the major chlorine-containing compounds (HCl, chloride, and CH

Indexed as

atmospheric oxidantsbiomass burning emissionCAM-Chem modelchlorine emission inventorytropospheric halogen chemistry

Identifiers

PMID39309413
PMCPMC11413532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.