ReviewInternational journal of particle therapy2024
Value of Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer.
Review in International journal of particle therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating multi-omics and clinical management in breast cancer: a comprehensive review.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Breast cancer radiotherapy and the risk of lung injury: Advances and perspectives.Advances in radiotherapy & nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac Substructure Dose Reduction and Toxicity Risk Assessment: IMPT Versus IMRT for Breast Cancer.International journal of particle therapy · 2025Article
- Optimization of CAR-T therapy based on metabolic remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.American journal of cancer research · 2025Review
- Dosimetric Comparison of Particle Radiotherapy and Photon VMAT for Left-Sided Breast Cancer Post Breast-Conserving Surgery.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the challenges and future of carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) in breast cancer, we summarized the progress of nonclinical and clinical studies on CIRT for breast cancer in this review. A total of 6 nonclinical studies have been reported, which demonstrated a better effect of Carbon-ion irradiation compared with X-ray in breast cancer cell lines (including triple-negative breast cancer and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-negative breast cancer). Combination with Hh inhibitor, dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and PARP inhibitor is promising as demonstrated in the in vitro studies. Approximately 34 patients with breast cancer went through CIRT treatment, as reported in 5 clinical studies. All studies demonstrated promising treatment effects with acceptable and manageable risks. In these studies, a total of 21 patients were reported with post-treatment response assessments, among whom 19 patients (90.48%) reported a response of complete response or partial response. The complete response rate was 66.67%. The time to complete the response ranged from 3 months to 24 months. No adverse events were observed in these studies except for grade 1 acute skin reaction in 14 out of the 21 patients (66.67%). Although the time to respond was longer than expected in some studies, the persistent responses and satisfactory safety profile provided the rationale for further research on this new therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.