Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309411›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of particle therapy2024

Value of Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer.

Bowen Yu, Kai-Wen Li, Yingyi Fan, Xiaohua Pei

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of particle therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bowen YuGalactophore Department, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Third Affiliated Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kai-Wen LiDepartment of Technology, CAS Ion Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Yingyi FanGalactophore Department, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Third Affiliated Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaohua PeiBeijing University of Chinese Medicine Xiamen Hospital, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the challenges and future of carbon-ion radiation therapy (CIRT) in breast cancer, we summarized the progress of nonclinical and clinical studies on CIRT for breast cancer in this review. A total of 6 nonclinical studies have been reported, which demonstrated a better effect of Carbon-ion irradiation compared with X-ray in breast cancer cell lines (including triple-negative breast cancer and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-negative breast cancer). Combination with Hh inhibitor, dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and PARP inhibitor is promising as demonstrated in the in vitro studies. Approximately 34 patients with breast cancer went through CIRT treatment, as reported in 5 clinical studies. All studies demonstrated promising treatment effects with acceptable and manageable risks. In these studies, a total of 21 patients were reported with post-treatment response assessments, among whom 19 patients (90.48%) reported a response of complete response or partial response. The complete response rate was 66.67%. The time to complete the response ranged from 3 months to 24 months. No adverse events were observed in these studies except for grade 1 acute skin reaction in 14 out of the 21 patients (66.67%). Although the time to respond was longer than expected in some studies, the persistent responses and satisfactory safety profile provided the rationale for further research on this new therapy.

Indexed as

Breast cancerCarbon-ion radiation therapyClinical studiesNonclinical studiesParticle therapy

Identifiers

PMID39309411
PMCPMC11415881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.