ArticleJournal of the West African College of Surgeons
Computed Tomographic Scan for Head Injury Patients: Any Justification for Adapting Routine Cranio-Cervical Examination Irrespective of Clinical Severity?
Article in Journal of the West African College of Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of concomitant cervical spine and head injury at our University Teaching Hospital in Nigeria and attempted to justify examining patients' head and cervical spine using computed tomography (CT) scan at presentation irrespective of the head injury severity by clinical assessment using Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Patients and Methods: All eligible patients, 1-80 years of age who presented with head injuries in the accident and emergency (A&E) unit during the study period, were included if they satisfied the inclusion criteria. Post-resuscitation GCS was assessed clinically, and head and cervical spine injury (CSI) were observed radiologically on cranio-cervical CT scan for all patients. The presence of cervical spine fractures, subluxation or dislocation was considered a confirmation of CSI. Results: There were 143 patients with head injuries studied; 90.2% of them were males. The mean age of the patients was 28.87 ± 15.93 years. The most common cause of injury was road traffic accidents in 110 (76.90%). The prevalence of CSI was 11.2%. Majority of the patients with CSI in this study (56.25%) had a mild head injury, 25% had a moderate head injury, and 18.75% had a severe head injury. The lower cervical spine was the most frequently injured segment in this study, involving 10 patients. Multi-level cervical vertebral body fractures of C3 to C6 were the most common form of CSI in this segment. Conclusion: The prevalence of concomitant cervical spine and head injury was significant in this study. This was confirmed among study subjects with a clinical diagnosis of mild-to-moderate head injury as compared with moderate-to-severe head injury. Therefore, all patients who sustained a head injury irrespective of severity are required to have a complete and rapid evaluation of the cervical spine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.