ArticlePopulation research and policy review2022
Variants of Second Demographic Transition: Empirical Evidence from Young Women's Attitudes About Childbearing.
Article in Population research and policy review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Second Demographic Transition (SDT) theory proposes that rising individualism and secularism lead to new attitudes that drive new family and fertility behaviors. Scholars have argued that analyzing heterogeneity in attitudes and behaviors in populations experiencing family change can clarify SDT processes. This study uses data from the Relationship Dynamics and Social Life study to describe how attitudinal heterogeneity in one small geographic area relates to predictions of SDT theory. We draw on earlier Latent Class Analysis (LCA) that identified groups that share patterns of attitudes in a sample of young women from a midwestern US county. LCA allows inductive identification of heterogeneous subgroups defined by attitudes themselves, which SDT theory posits as a key causal factor in demographic change. We compare the heterogeneous patterns of attitudes in these subgroups of young women to predictions of SDT theory, then compare groups' subsequent fertility at early adult ages. We find that most groups endorse some attitudes predicted by original SDT theory, but only one group matches most of those predictions. We identify other groups with attitudes consistent with the American religious exceptionalism model and the diverging destinies model, as well as heterogeneity beyond that predicted by these theories. Subsequent fertility at early ages is patterned by membership in these attitude groups. We discuss how the findings might shed light on possible demographic trajectories in the United States and argue for the value of identifying and tracking the prevalence of such groups in nationally representative samples over time.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.