Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309331›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of lifestyle medicine

Physical Activity and the Health of a Nation: A National Challenge and Collective Response.

Bryant J Webber, Daniel B Bornstein, Mary Anne Kiel, Robert C Wilkins, Cedric X Bryant

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of lifestyle medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. SCORE2 Outperforms Pol-SCORE in Detecting Increased Cardiovascular Risk.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Great Progress, Enormous Challenges.American journal of lifestyle medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bryant J WebberUS Air Force Academy, USAF Academy, CO, USA (BJW).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2099-2671
Daniel B BornsteinMilitary Settings Sector, U.S. National Physical Activity Plan, Norwich, VT, USA (DBB).
Mary Anne KielAir Force Medical Agency, Falls Church, VA, USA (MAK).
Robert C WilkinsPresident's Council on Sports, Fitness & Nutrition, Leesburg, VA, USA (RCW).
Cedric X BryantAmerican Council on Exercise, Redmond, WA, USA (CXB).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historic recruitment and retention challenges confront the U.S. military. In an invited panel discussion at Lifestyle Medicine 2023, we argued that widespread physical inactivity is contributing to these challenges, and that Lifestyle Medicine approaches should be part of the solution. Our aim in this commentary is to recapture the most salient messages from that discussion. First, we summarize significant epidemiologic studies that describe the scope of the problem among future recruits, current service members, and Veterans. Then, in the optimistic spirit that characterizes both the armed forces and Lifestyle Medicine communities, we outline several potential solutions. By increasing physical activity during the school day, using wearable technology to monitor and prompt health behaviors, addressing the other pillars of Lifestyle Medicine (especially sleep, nutrition, and stress management), aligning efforts with current health frameworks in the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs, and recruiting Lifestyle Medicine professionals, we are convinced that we can improve the health of our nation and, in so doing, strengthen military readiness and national security.

Indexed as

lifestyle medicinemilitary readinessnational securityphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID39309331
PMCPMC11412370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.