Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309313›Full record

ArticleCerebral circulation - cognition and behavior2024

What have observational studies taught us about brain health? An exploration of select cardiovascular risks and cognitive function.

Sara Hassani, Philip B Gorelick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara HassaniDuke University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, USA.
Philip B GorelickDavee Department of Neurology, Division of Stroke and Neurocritical Care, Simpson Querrey Neurovascular Research Laboratory, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 633 North St. Clair Street, 19th Floor, Chicago, IL 60611 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observational research studies serve as the cornerstone for gathering evidence on risk factors and contributors to cognitive decline and impairment. The evidence can then be combined with data from preclinical studies and randomized controlled trials to ultimately inform the development of effective interventions and the content of guidance statements. Observational cohort designs on modifiable risk factors and brain health can be particularly beneficial for studying questions that are unethical or impractical for a clinical trial setting, associations with dementia which may develop over decades, and underrepresented populations typically not included in clinical trials. This chapter will review the major observational, epidemiologic studies pertaining to the traditional vascular risk factors - hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, and physical inactivity - and how they may impact brain health.

Indexed as

Brain healthCognitive impairmentModifiableObservational studyRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID39309313
PMCPMC11414496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.