Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309298›Full record

ArticleInterventional cardiology (London, England)2024

Geographical Inequality in Access to Aortic Valve Intervention in England: A Report from the UK Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Registry and National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit.

Suleman Aktaa, Noman Ali, Peter F Ludman, Nick Curzen, Andrew T Goodwin, David Hildick-Smith, Rajesh K Kharbanda, Peter D Jones, Sue Manuel, Satya Phanthala and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional cardiology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Suleman AktaaDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds, UK.
Noman AliDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds, UK.
Peter F LudmanInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham Birmingham, UK.
Nick CurzenDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton, UK.
Andrew T GoodwinDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust Middlesbrough, UK.
David Hildick-SmithDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton, UK.
Rajesh K KharbandaNational Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford, UK.
Peter D JonesNational Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, NHS Arden & GEM Leicester, UK.
Sue ManuelNational Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, NHS Arden & GEM Leicester, UK.
Satya PhanthalaNational Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, NHS Arden & GEM Leicester, UK.
Daniel J BlackmanDepartment of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For patients with severe aortic stenosis, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a less invasive but equally effective treatment option compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). In 2019, we reported low rates of TAVI in the UK compared with other countries in western Europe and highlighted profound geographical variation in TAVI care. Here, we provide contemporary data on access to aortic valve replacement by either TAVI or SAVR across clinical commissioning groups in England. Methods: We obtained aggregated data from the UK TAVI registry and the National Adult Cardiac Surgery Audit between 2019 and 2023. Rates of TAVI and SAVR procedures per million population were reported by clinical commissioning groups. The relationship between TAVI and SAVR rates was determined using Pearson correlation coefficients. Results: In 2022/23, the rates of TAVI and SAVR in England were 136 per million population and 60 per million population, respectively. The observed increase in TAVI rates since 2019/20 corresponded with a decline in SAVR rates. There remains substantial variation in access to both procedures, with an over tenfold variation in TAVI rates, and an over fourfold variation in SAVR rates across clinical commissioning groups in England. No relationship was identified between the rates of TAVI and those for SAVR (correlation coefficient 0.06). Conclusion: Geographical heterogeneity in access to TAVI persists over time, with the low rates of TAVI in many areas not compensated for by higher rates of SAVR, indicating an overall inequality in the treatment of severe aortic stenosis.

Indexed as

Aortic stenosisEnglandgeographical inequalitysurgical aortic valve replacementtranscatheter aortic valve implantation

Identifiers

PMID39309298
PMCPMC11413983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.