Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309241›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on behavior science2024

Evaluating Experts' Consensus on Behavioral Principles.

Raymond G Miltenberger, Amalix M Flores

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on behavior science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Raymond G MiltenbergerDepartment of Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6331-298X
Amalix M FloresDepartment of Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida, 13301 Bruce B Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL 33612 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5886-4288

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the history of our field, scholars have emphasized the critical importance that behavioral principles play in applied behavior analysis, underlining their central position as the foundation on which the field is built. Therefore, behavior analysts must have a robust comprehension of behavioral principles to be conceptually systematic, starting with understanding what constitutes a behavioral principle. Although one might assume that the behavior analytical literature clearly identifies a set of basic principles that define our field, there is no generally agreed-upon list. This study aimed to get consensus from doctoral-level behavior analysts on what they viewed as the basic principles of behavior analysis. To do so, we created a list of terms from behavior analysis texts and surveyed participants to identify whether each term constituted a basic principle or a behavioral procedure. The results suggest that there is not good consensus on what constitutes behavioral principles among doctoral-level behavior analysts who completed the survey and that there may be differences in the views of faculty and nonfaculty behavior analysts. Potential contributing factors to these results are discussed. This survey study constitutes a first step in focusing behavior analysts on this important topic and starting a discussion that could further clarify the principles that define our field.

Indexed as

Basic principles of behaviorBehavioral principlesBehavior change proceduresSurvey

Identifiers

PMID39309241
PMCPMC11411046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.