ArticleThe Journal of mathematical sociology2024
A Return to Biased Nets: New Specifications and Approximate Bayesian Inference.
Article in The Journal of mathematical sociology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The biased net paradigm was the first general and empirically tractable scheme for parameterizing complex patterns of dependence in networks, expressing deviations from uniform random graph structure in terms of latent "bias events," whose realizations enhance reciprocity, transitivity, or other structural features. Subsequent developments have introduced local specifications of biased nets, which reduce the need for approximations required in early specifications based on tracing processes. Here, we show that while one such specification leads to inconsistencies, a closely related Markovian specification both evades these difficulties and can be extended to incorporate new types of effects. We introduce the notion of inhibitory bias events, with satiation as an example, which are useful for avoiding degeneracies that can arise from closure bias terms. Although our approach does not lead to a computable likelihood, we provide a strategy for approximate Bayesian inference using random forest prevision. We demonstrate our approach on a network of friendship ties among college students, recapitulating a relationship between the sibling bias and tie strength posited in earlier work by Fararo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.