Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309199›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2024

Tumor Markers in Differential Diagnosis of Benign Ovarian Masses.

Tianlong Li, Nana Hou, Lili Mao, Fangmei Liu, Zilong Ma, Li Wang, Xiyue Xu, Guanghui Yan, Yujia Han, Jinxian Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Abnormal adnexal uptake inJournal of ovarian research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tianlong Li *Department of Gynecology, Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5185-0767
Nana Hou *Department of Gynecology, Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Lili MaoDepartment of Gynecology, Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Fangmei LiuDepartment of Gynecology, Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zilong MaDepartment of Gynecology, Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Li WangDepartment of Gynecology, Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiyue XuDepartment of Gynecology, Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Guanghui YanDepartment of Gynecology, Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yujia HanDepartment of Gynecology, Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jinxian WeiDepartment of Gynecology, Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although there are many benign tumors in the ovarian adnexal area, the four most common types are still luteal cyst, ovarian mature cystic teratoma (OMCT), ovarian endometriosis, and benign epithelial tumors of the ovary. Purpose: This study aimed to examine the correlation between six tumor markers (CEA, AFP, CA125, CA19-9, SCC, HE4) in the differential diagnosis of female adnexal benign masses and assess their diagnostic value. Patients and Methods: In this study, 135 patients with adnexal benign masses were treated in Zhengzhou first people's Hospital from January 2018 to January 2023. 135 patients were divided into four groups: luteal cyst (13.3%), OMCT (42.2%), ovarian endometriosis (23.7%) and benign epithelial tumors of the ovary (including mucinous cystadenoma and serous cystadenoma) in group D. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the diagnostic value of each marker and combined detection. Results: The diameter of luteal cysts was significantly smaller than that of benign ovarian tumors (p < 0.001). ROC analysis showed that the combination of AFP, CA125, CA19-9, and SCC had a higher diagnostic rate for luteal cysts (AUC=0.871; sensitivity: 71.8%; specificity: 88.9). The SCC level in OMCT was significantly higher than in other benign ovarian tumors (p=0.007). ROC analysis indicated that the combination of AFP, HE4, and SCC had a higher diagnostic rate for OMCT (AUC=0.753; sensitivity: 65.4%; specificity: 75.4%). The CA125 level in ovarian endometriosis was significantly higher than in other accessory benign tumors (p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated that the combination of AFP, CA125, and CA19-9 had a higher diagnostic rate for ovarian endometriosis (AUC=0.935; sensitivity: 76.7%; specificity: 96.9%). The tumor diameter of benign epithelial tumors of the ovary was significantly larger than that of other benign ovarian tumors (p < 0.001). ROC analysis revealed that the combination of CA125 and CA19-9 had a higher diagnostic rate for benign epithelial tumors of the ovary (AUC=0.792; sensitivity: 64.5%; specificity: 85.7%). Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that the combined use of tumor markers (CEA, AFP, CA125, CA19-9, SCC, and HE4) has value in diagnosing benign ovarian tumors, including luteal cysts, OMCT, ovarian endometriosis, and benign epithelial tumors of the ovary. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of this study, which include its single-center nature and the small sample size. Despite these limitations, the results highlight the potential utility of these markers in clinical practice.

Indexed as

luteal cystOMCTovarian endometriosisovarian epithelial benign tumorstumor markers

Identifiers

PMID39309199
PMCPMC11414758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.