ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2024
Biological conduits based on spider silk for reconstruction of extended nerve defects.
Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MUW researcher of the month: Sarah Stadlmayr, Bsc., MSc, PhD.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The availability of appropriate conduits remains an obstacle for successful reconstruction of long-distance nerve defects. In previous sheep trials, we were able to bridge 6 cm nerve gaps with nerve conduits based on spider silk fibers with full functional outcomes. Here, we describe the first application of spider silk for nerve repair in humans. Methods: Four patients with extended nerve defects (>20 cm) underwent nerve reconstruction by interposition of conduits that were composed of spider silk fibers contained in autologous veins. The longitudinal luminal fibers (approx. 2500 fibers per graft) consisted of drag line silk from Results: In all patients, primary wound healing and no adverse reactions to the implanted spider silk material were observed. Patients regained the following relevant functions: protective sensibility, full flexor function with near-normal grasp and powerful function after microvascular gracilis muscle transfer, and key grip function and gross finger flexion after additional tenodesis. One patient with sciatic nerve reconstruction developed protective sensibility of the lower leg, foot, and gait, enabling normal walking and jogging. No neuroma formation or neuropathic or chronic pain occurred in any of the patients. Conclusions: For patients with extended peripheral nerve defects in the extremities, use of conduits based on spider silk fibers offers the possibility of restoring sensory function and protection from neuroma. This kind of nerve bridges provides new perspectives for the reconstruction of complex and long-distance nerve defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.