Analysis of rhizosphere soil microbial diversity and its functions between Dahongpao mother tree and cutting Dahongpao.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. MaxEnt with remote sensing for tea plantation suitability under climate change.iScience · 2026
   Article
2. Dahongpao mother tree affects soil microbial community and nutrient cycling by increasing rhizosphere soil characteristic metabolite content.Frontiers in plant science · 2025
   Article
3. Fertilization differences alter the diversity and function of tea plant rhizosphere soil microbial communities, thus affecting tea plant growth.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as