Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309159›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Lawyer-client relationship in divorce proceedings: development and validation of a new instrument.

Ana Martínez-Pampliega, Susana Cormenzana, Ma Carmen García-Garnica, Inés Pellón-Elexpuru, Laura Merino

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Martínez-PampliegaDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Susana CormenzanaDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Ma Carmen García-GarnicaDepartment of Civil Law, Faculty of Law, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Inés Pellón-ElexpuruDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Laura MerinoDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study is based on the paradigm of collaborative law and the current absence of instruments that evaluate the lawyer-client relationship as a function of the needs of the family system. The objective was to construct and validate an instrument, conceptualizing the lawyer-client relationship as a helping relationship. Method: Two groups of experts and 239 parents (58% mothers and 42% fathers), users of Family Visitation Centers, participated in the study. The content, construct, and criterion validity of the instrument, as well as its invariance for both parents, were analyzed. Results: The resulting 12-item instrument has been shown to have a two-dimensional structure, invariant for both parents, with high psychometric solidity. Discussion: The LCR scale seems to be a valuable and effective measure for use in a legal context, with important correlations with the parents' psychological well-being, leading to a promising and relevant instrument for the holistic approach to the divorce process.

Indexed as

assessmentcollaborative lawdivorcelawyerparental symptomatology

Identifiers

PMID39309159
PMCPMC11414410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.