Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309153›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Evaluating Open Dialogue in Italian mental health services: evidence from a multisite prospective cohort study.

Raffaella Pocobello, Francesca Camilli, Pina Ridente, Giuseppa Caloro, Maria Giuseppe Balice, Giuseppe Tibaldi, Marcello Macario, Marco d'Alema, Elisa Gulino, Tarek El Sehity

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Raffaella PocobelloInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, CNR, Rome, Italy.
Francesca CamilliInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, CNR, Rome, Italy.
Pina RidenteAzienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (ASU GI), Trieste, Italy.
Giuseppa CaloroDipartimento di Salute Mentale e Dipendenze Patologiche - AUSL Modena, Modena, Italy.
Maria Giuseppe BaliceDSM - ASL Città di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Giuseppe TibaldiDipartimento di Salute Mentale e Dipendenze Patologiche - AUSL Modena, Modena, Italy.
Marcello MacarioDipartimento Salute Mentale e Dipendenze, ASL 2, Savona, Italy.
Marco d'AlemaDipartimento Salute Mentale e Dipendenze patologiche, Asl Roma 6, Rome, Italy.
Elisa GulinoModulo Dipartimentale Salute Mentale 1 Calatino, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Catania, Catania, Italy.
Tarek El SehityInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, CNR, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This longitudinal study aimed to quantitatively document and evaluate the implementation and outcomes of the Open Dialogue (OD) approach within Italian Mental Health Departments (MHDs), focusing on the ratings of OD-network meetings by patients and their families and assessing the clinical outcomes over a span of 12 months. Results: Over the course of the study, 58 patients participated in 517 OD-network meetings, demonstrating a high level of satisfaction with the care received, as evidenced by the Session Rating Scale (SRS) and Outcome Rating Scale (ORS). Clinically, significant improvements were observed in the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE-OM), and the Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS), indicating enhanced psychological and social functioning. The SRS scores showed that satisfaction with the meetings increased over time, while the ORS indicated that both patients and their social networks perceived gradual improvements throughout the therapy. Conclusion: The OD approach within Italian MHDs was successfully implemented and well-received by patients and their social networks, yielding significant clinical improvements. These findings suggest the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating the OD model into the Italian public mental health system, supporting its potential for broader application in diverse healthcare settings. The study highlights the importance of continuous engagement and evaluation to maintain high standards of practice and suggests that OD can be a valuable addition to existing mental health care practices, promoting recovery through inclusive, dialogue-based interventions.

Indexed as

clinical outcomesmental healthOpen Dialoguepatient satisfactionsocial networkstreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID39309153
PMCPMC11414408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.