ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
The efficacy of personalized psychological interventions in adolescents: a scoping review and meta-analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Digital reminiscence therapy in dementia care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Psychological Treatments for Problematic Use of Internet, Video Games, Social Media and Instant Messaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of network analysis-driven personalized digital interventions versus standard intervention for depression: a proof-of-concept pilot randomized controlled trial.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Advancing in Personalization of Psychological, Indicated Preventive Interventions: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Adolescents at High-Risk of Developing Emotional Disorders.Child psychiatry and human development · 2026Article
- Gender Differences in Psychological Strengths Among Rural Adolescents.Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing : official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc · 2026Article
- Article
- The Professional, Emotional, and Relational Experience of Psychologists Working With Adolescent Cancer Patients.Continuity in education · 2026Article
- Identifying predictors of use of mental health services and supports during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of the CHILD COVID-19 Add-on Study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Development and Effectiveness of Humanities-Based Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Adolescents With Problematic Gaming Behavior.Psychiatry investigation · 2026Article
- Feasibility results from a randomized trial of a text message-delivered sexual violence harm reduction intervention among college students.Research square · 2025Article
- Insights from fifteen years of real-world development, testing and implementation of youth digital mental health interventions.Internet interventions · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review compared the efficacy of personalized psychological interventions to standardized interventions for adolescents. We conducted a scoping review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared personalized interventions with standardized interventions in adolescents. Data was analyzed using Bayesian multilevel random effects meta-analysis. Eligible studies were identified through five databases: Scopus, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Moderation analysis was conducted to explain potential sources of effect size heterogeneity. Eight studies across 13 articles (participant Systematic review registration: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XRNCG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.