Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39309058›Full record

ReviewEpilepsy currents

The Tell on Telehealth.

Anup D Patel, Charuta Joshi, Rohit Das, John M Stern, Susan T Herman, Barry E Gidal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsy currents. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anup D PatelDivision of Neurology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9313-1541
Charuta JoshiDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Health, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4502-7242
Rohit DasDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Sciences, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0093-1799
John M SternDepartment of Neurology, Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Susan T HermanDepartment of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Barry E GidalDivision of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Telehealth in epilepsy care is not new. During the COVID-19 public health emergency, telehealth became more readily used to deliver epilepsy care. However, a summarized guidance of use in caring for people with epilepsy utilizing telehealth is needed. Methods: Existing literature was reviewed to provide guidance on various aspects of telehealth. Billing aspects are reviewed. Recommendations and considerations along with benefits and barriers to telehealth are provided. Results: Telehealth can be a preferred delivery route of care for people with epilepsy in specific situations. Examples include psychiatric complaints, medication management, and follow-up visits for noncomplicated epilepsy care. In addition, telehealth is useful for patients who need postoperative visits, are not able to travel, or live in residential facilities. In-person care may be more suitable for patients who are medically complex, have language barriers or difficulty with resource access, hearing impaired, or have neurostimulation devices where remote monitoring or programming options are infeasible. Discussion: Telehealth care for people with epilepsy can be a useful and important method of care delivery. It should remain an option for providers to use in epilepsy clinical care. It is important for the neurology provider to understand the benefits, billing, and barriers to providing telehealth.

Indexed as

epilepsyhealth care deliverytelehealthtelemedicineteleneurology

Identifiers

PMID39309058
PMCPMC11412410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.