ArticleEpilepsy currents
The Promise and Practicality of Addressing Sex as a Biological Variable and the Ovarian Cycle in Preclinical Epilepsy Research.
Article in Epilepsy currents. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anticonvulsant effects, safety, and sex-dependent molecular signatures of cannabidiol treatment in a preclinical model of audiogenic epilepsy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Etiologies of patients with adult-onset epilepsy over the past 25 years: a retrospective study in China.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Modified Pentylenetetrazole Model for Acute Seizure Induction in Rats.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Allopregnanolone as an Adjunct Therapy to Midazolam is More Effective Than Midazolam Alone in Suppressing Soman-Induced Status Epilepticus in Male Rats.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Seizures and epilepsy affect people of all sexes and genders. In the last several years, funding agency initiatives such as the U.S. National Institutes of Health policy on sex as a biological variable (SABV) have intended to encourage researchers to study both males and females from cell to tissue to organism and analyze and report the resulting data with sex as a factor. Preclinical epilepsy research, however, continues to be plagued by confusion regarding both the SABV policy and its implementation, reflecting similar beliefs in the larger neuroscience research community. This article aims to address some common misconceptions and provide practical tools and suggestions for preclinical epilepsy researchers in implementing SABV and analysis of the female ovarian cycle (estrous cycle in rodents) in their research programs, with a focus on studies using rodent models. Examples of recent publications in preclinical epilepsy research highlighting the value of incorporating SABV and information on the estrous cycle are included. The specifics of how best to address SABV and the estrous cycle can vary depending on the needs and goals of a particular research program, but an embrace of these physiological factors by the preclinical epilepsy research community promises to yield more rigorous research and improved treatment strategies for all people with epilepsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.