Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39308983›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2024

Functional dependence following intensive care unit-treated sepsis: three-year follow-up results from the prospective Mid-German Sepsis Cohort (MSC).

Carolin Fleischmann-Struzek, Sebastian Born, Miriam Kesselmeier, E Wesley Ely, Kristin Töpfer, Heike Romeike, Michael Bauer, Sven Bercker, Ulf Bodechtel, Sandra Fiedler and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Carolin Fleischmann-StruzekInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital/Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Sebastian BornInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital/Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Miriam KesselmeierInstitute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences (IMSID), Jena University Hospital/Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
E Wesley ElyVeteran's Affairs Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, TN, USA.
Kristin TöpferIntegrated Research and Treatment Center, Centre for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital/Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Heike RomeikeSepsis Foundation, Berlin, Germany.
Michael BauerIntegrated Research and Treatment Center, Centre for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital/Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Sven BerckerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Ulf BodechtelDepartment of Interdisciplinary Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitation, Klinik Bavaria Kreischa, Kreischa, Germany.
Sandra FiedlerCenter for Clinical Studies (ZKS Jena), Jena University Hospital/Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Heinrich V GroesdonkDepartment of Interdisciplinary Intensive Care Medicine and Intermediate Care, Helios Clinic Erfurt, Health and Medical University Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
Sirak PetrosMedical ICU, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Stefanie PlatzerIntegrated Research and Treatment Center, Centre for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital/Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Hendrik RüddelIntegrated Research and Treatment Center, Centre for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital/Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Torsten SchreiberCentral Hospital Bad Berka GmbH, Bad Berka, Germany.
Konrad ReinhartDepartment of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (CCM, CVK), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
André ScheragIntegrated Research and Treatment Center, Centre for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital/Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surviving sepsis can lead to chronic physical, psychological and cognitive impairments, which affect millions of patients worldwide, including survivors after COVID-19 viral sepsis. We aimed to characterize the magnitude and trajectory of functional dependence and new impairments post-sepsis. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study including sepsis survivors who had been discharged from five German intensive care units (ICUs), until 36 months post-discharge. Primary outcome was functional dependence, defined as ≥1 impaired activity of daily living (ADL; 10-item ADL score <100), self-reported nursing care dependence or nursing care level. Secondary outcome was post-sepsis morbidity in the physical, psychological or cognitive domain. We used a multistate, competing risk model to address competing events in the course of dependence, and conducted multiple linear regression analyses to identify predictors associated with the ADL score. Findings: Of 3210 sepsis patients screened, 1968 survived the ICU treatment (61.3%). A total of 753 were included in the follow-up assessments of the Mid-German Sepsis cohort. Patients had a median age of 65 (Q1-Q3 56-74) years, 64.8% (488/753) were male and 76.1% (573/753) had a septic shock. Considering competing risk modelling, the probability of still being functional dependent was about 25%, while about 30% regained functional independence and 45% died within the three years post-sepsis. Patients reported a high burden of new and often overlapping impairments until three years post-sepsis. In the subgroup of three-year survivors (n = 330), new physical impairments affected 91.2% (n = 301) while new cognitive and psychological impairments were reported by 57.9% (n = 191) and 40.9% (n = 135), respectively. Patients with pre-existing functional limitations and higher age were at risk for low ADL scores three years after sepsis. Interpretation: Sepsis survivorship was associated with a broad range of new impairments and led to functional dependence in around one quarter of patients. Targeted measures are needed to mitigate the burden of this Post-Sepsis-Syndrome and increase the proportion of patients that achieve functional improvements. Funding: This work was supported by the Integrated Research and Treatment Center, Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC) at the Jena University Hospital funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research and by the Rudolf Presl GmbH & Co, Kreischa, Germany.

Indexed as

Functional outcomeLong-term outcomePost-Sepsis-SyndromeSepsisSequelae

Identifiers

PMID39308983
PMCPMC11415812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.