ReviewBladder (San Francisco, Calif.)2024
A narrative review of advances in the management of urothelial cancer: Diagnostics and treatments.
Review in Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-omics integration and clinical validation identify CKAP2 as a diagnostic biomarker for bladder cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Identifying PLAU as a shared pathogenic gene in type 2 diabetes and bladder urothelial carcinoma through integrated transcriptomic analysis and machine learning for diagnostic and therapeutic value.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Advancements in genetic circuits as part of intelligent biotherapy for the treatment of bladder cancer: A review.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) refers to the malignancies originating from transitional epithelium located on the upper and lower urinary tract. Precise diagnosis of UC is crucial since it dictates the treatment efficacy and prognosis of UC patients. Conventional diagnostic approaches of UC mainly fall into four types, including liquid biopsy, imaging examination, endoscopic examination, and histopathological assessment, among others, each of them has contributed to a more accurate diagnosis of the condition. Therapeutically, UC is primarily managed through surgical intervention. In recent years, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been incrementally used and is showing superiority in terms of lowered perioperative morbidity and quicker recovery with similar oncological outcomes achieved. For advanced UC (aUC), medical therapy is dominant. While platinum-based chemotherapies are the standard first-line option for aUC, some novel treatment alternatives have recently been introduced, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), targeted therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). ADCs, a group of sophisticated biopharmaceutical agents consisting of monoclonal antibodies, cytotoxic payload, and linker, have been increasingly drawing the attention of clinicians. In this review, we synthesize the recent developments in the precise diagnosis of UC and provide an overview of the treatment options available, including MIS for UC and emerging medications, especially ADCs of aUC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.