ArticleBladder (San Francisco, Calif.)2024
Evaluation of outcomes of clinical phenotyping-based treatment for bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis.
Article in Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome in Men.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bladder pain syndrome/Interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) is clinically of diverse types because different causes contribute to the development of their symptoms. It is important to classify patients into various groups based on the possible etiopathogenesis of their condition. Treatment may be tailored to each specific group according to the possible cause. Methodology: Twenty-five patients diagnosed with BPS/IC were categorized into four different clinical phenotypes (CP) based on their history of symptoms, allergy, dysfunctional voiding, neuropathic pain, and the presence of Hunner's ulcer. Some patients could be classified into multiple groups. The patients were given oral pentosan polysulfate, and treatment specific to their CP. Patients in CP1, CP2, and CP3 groups received, respectively hydroxyzine, clonazepam, and amitriptyline. Patients with Hunner's lesions (HL) (CP4) underwent hydro distension and ablation of the lesion, followed by intravesical instillation of heparin and hydrocortisone. The patients were evaluated using the Apollo clinical scoring (ACS) system and their clinical scores were recorded at 1, 3, and 6 month(s). Results: Among the 25 patients, 5, 7, 4, and 9 patients were classified into CP 1 - CP4 groups respectively, and were all subjected to ACS assessment. In CP1 group (allergy group), 80% (4/5) of patients responded well to the treatment and 20% (1/5) had unsatisfactory responses. In CP2 group (dysfunctional voiding group), 71.42% (5/7) patients had good, and 28.57% (2/7) had excellent responses. In CP3 group (neuropathic pain group), 28.57% (3/4) patients had excellent, and 75% (1/4) patients had good responses. In CP4 group (HL group), 33.33% (3/9) patients had unsatisfactory, 44.44% (4/9) achieved good, and 22.22% (2/9) had excellent responses. Overall, 16% (4/25) patients had unsatisfactory, 56% (14/25) attained good, and 28% (7/25) had an excellent response at the completion of the study. Conclusion: Using clinical phenotyping-based features indicative of etiology could potentially improve treatment outcomes by targeting the specific pathological processes contributing to the patients' symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.