ReviewClinical optometry2024
Digital Eye Strain: Updated Perspectives.
Review in Clinical optometry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07488208 (Crossover Comparison of Two Novel Stenfilcon A Contact Lens Designs), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Crossover Comparison of Two Novel Stenfilcon A Contact Lens Designs
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of a Toric, Monthly, Soft Contact Lens in Digital Device Users.Clinical optometry · 2025Trial
- Prevalence of Digital Eye Strain Symptoms Among Sudanese Medical Students During Conflict-Induced Online Learning: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Comment on "Impact of Computer-Aided Detection on Endoscopist's Gaze-Shift Distance During Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial".Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Regional Tear Film Quality Changes Across Eye Gaze Directions Revealed by Spatial Mapping and Threshold Sensitivity Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Investigation of Skin Circulation Hemodynamics Using Skin Laser Speckle Flowgraphy After Trapezius Muscle Self-Stretching.Muscles (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Digital Eye Strain from Digital Device Usage Among University Students: Prevalence and Associated Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Global Perspectives on Therapy for Noninfectious Conjunctival Hyperemia: A Narrative Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Physical complaints and emotional symptoms in the context of series watching: a multicenter latent profile and network analysis in Brazil and Canada.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Prioritizing embryologist health: occupational health hazards and preventive strategies.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Digital eye health and behavioral determinants of screen use among university students in the UAE.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Sports vision training reduces digital eye strain in screen-exposed university students: a randomized controlled trial of visuomotor and visual-attentional adaptation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- A Review of Digital Eye Strain: Binocular Vision Anomalies, Ocular Surface Changes, and the Need for Objective Assessment.Journal of eye movement research · 2025Review
- Effects of Trapezius Muscle Self-Stretching on Muscle Stiffness and Choroidal Circulatory Dynamics: An Evaluation Using Ultrasound Strain Elastography and Laser Speckle Flowgraphy.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Visual Functioning and Mental Health in the Digital Age.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Myopia and daylight-A combination of factors.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Digital eye strain (DES) is a growing worldwide concern because digital devices are prevalent in both our work and home lives. The purpose of this review was to summarize clinically relevant and evolving key topics related to DES. Methods: A PubMed.gov search was conducted on or before June 8, 2024. No date restrictions were used during the primary search. The search was aimed at detecting all articles related to DES; thus, the search terms only included "digital eye strain" or "computer vision syndrome". Results: The two most used, validated DES questionnaires are the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q) and Computer Vision Symptom Scale (CVSS17). The world-wide prevalence of DES ranges from 8.2% to 100% depending upon the subjects evaluated and the method used to evaluate them. The most common DES symptoms include headache, eye strain, eye redness, eye itching, tearing, photophobia, burning sensation, blurred vision, eye pain, neck and shoulder pain, and eye dryness. Ocular surface symptoms in DES are integrally tied to decreased blink frequency, which causes ocular surface desiccation, increased osmolarity, and dry eye-like symptoms. The most studied DES-specific treatments are improving subjects' environment, artificial tears, blinking exercises, and near work breaks. Conclusion: DES is a highly prevalent condition that should be regularly screened for in clinic with a validated diagnosis instrument. While there are several treatment options, the community's treatment approach is evolving and primarily focused on treating the visual and dry eye-like symptoms associated with the condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.