Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39308959›Full record

ReviewClinical optometry2024

Digital Eye Strain: Updated Perspectives.

Andrew D Pucker, Aaron M Kerr, Jennifer Sanderson, Chris Lievens

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical optometry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07488208 (Crossover Comparison of Two Novel Stenfilcon A Contact Lens Designs), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07488208 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Crossover Comparison of Two Novel Stenfilcon A Contact Lens Designs

TypeinterventionalSponsorSouthern College of OptometryRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsComputer Vision Syndrome, AccommodationArmsStenfilcon A contact lens designs with and without Digital Boost technology that incorporate a 0.3D add power into the lens
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Digital Eye Strain from Digital Device Usage Among University Students: Prevalence and Associated Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew D PuckerClinical and Medical Sciences, Lexitas Pharma Services, Durham, NC, USA.
Aaron M KerrSouthern College of Optometry, Memphis, TN, USA.
Jennifer SandersonSouthern College of Optometry, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3021-2880
Chris LievensSouthern College of Optometry, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4208-6175

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Digital eye strain (DES) is a growing worldwide concern because digital devices are prevalent in both our work and home lives. The purpose of this review was to summarize clinically relevant and evolving key topics related to DES. Methods: A PubMed.gov search was conducted on or before June 8, 2024. No date restrictions were used during the primary search. The search was aimed at detecting all articles related to DES; thus, the search terms only included "digital eye strain" or "computer vision syndrome". Results: The two most used, validated DES questionnaires are the Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS-Q) and Computer Vision Symptom Scale (CVSS17). The world-wide prevalence of DES ranges from 8.2% to 100% depending upon the subjects evaluated and the method used to evaluate them. The most common DES symptoms include headache, eye strain, eye redness, eye itching, tearing, photophobia, burning sensation, blurred vision, eye pain, neck and shoulder pain, and eye dryness. Ocular surface symptoms in DES are integrally tied to decreased blink frequency, which causes ocular surface desiccation, increased osmolarity, and dry eye-like symptoms. The most studied DES-specific treatments are improving subjects' environment, artificial tears, blinking exercises, and near work breaks. Conclusion: DES is a highly prevalent condition that should be regularly screened for in clinic with a validated diagnosis instrument. While there are several treatment options, the community's treatment approach is evolving and primarily focused on treating the visual and dry eye-like symptoms associated with the condition.

Indexed as

computer vision syndromedigital devicedigital eye strainprevalencesymptoms

Identifiers

PMID39308959
PMCPMC11416787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.