ArticlePulmonary circulation2024
MicroRNA expression alteration in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review.
Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- microRNAs as epigenetic biomarkers for CTEPH: a case-control study towards personalised medicine.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Identification of miRNA biomarkers for essential hypertension in small samples based on MPGAM.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MicroRNA expression alteration in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review.Pulmonary circulation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is marked by persistent blood clots in pulmonary arteries, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Emerging evidence highlights the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in pulmonary hypertension, though findings on miRNA expression in CTEPH remain limited and inconsistent. This systematic review evaluates miRNA expression changes in CTEPH and their direction. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we registered our protocol in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024524469). We included studies on miRNA expression in CTEPH with comparative or analytical designs, excluding nonhuman studies, interventions, non-English texts, conference abstracts, and editorials. Databases searched included PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CENTRAL, and ProQuest. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool assessed bias risk, and results were synthesized narratively. Of 313 unique studies, 39 full texts were reviewed, and 9 met inclusion criteria, totaling 235 participants. Blood samples were analysed using quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction. Seven miRNAs (miR-665, miR-3202, miR-382, miR-127, miR-664, miR-376c, miR-30) were uniformly upregulated, while nine (miR-20a-5p13, miR-17-5p, miR-93-5p, miR-22, let-7b, miR-106b-5p, miR-3148, miR-320-a, miR-320b) were downregulated in CTEPH patients. Two upregulated miRNAs (miR-127 and miR-30a) were consistently associated with previous evidence in the mechanism inducing the development of CTEPH, and five downregulated miRNAs (miR-20-a, miR-17-5p, miR-93-5p, let-7b, miR-106b-5p) were associated with a protective effect against CTEPH. We also identified gaps in the literature where the evidence for five upregulated miRNAs (miR-665, miR-3202, miR-382, miR-664 and miR-376c) and four downregulated miRNAs (miR-22, miR-3148, miR-320-a, and miR-320b) in CTEPH is conflicting. Our findings offer insights into the role of miRNAs in CTEPH and underscore the need for further research to validate these miRNAs as biomarkers or therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.