ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024
Pulsed field ablation as a feasible option for the treatment of epicardial left ventricular summit premature complex foci near the coronary arteries: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ventricular pulsed field ablation from bench to bedside: preclinical and clinical evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- Pulsed Field Ablation Terminated Atrial Fibrillation Triggered by Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Reviewing Strategies and Our Approach to Mapping and Ablation of Left Ventricular Summit Arrhythmias.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiofrequency catheter ablation in the left ventricular summit region is a challenging procedure due to proximity to the coronary arteries. Pulsed field ablation, a novel non-thermal ablation modality, does not cause damage to coronary arteries and may be used in the left ventricular summit region. Case summary: We describe a 45-year-old symptomatic patient with epicardial left ventricular summit premature ventricular complexes. Successful ablation of the focus was achieved by pulsed field ablation via a subxiphoid epicardial approach. Radiofrequency ablation would most likely have been ineffective due to the epicardial fat layer and potentially unsafe due to the proximity to the coronary arteries. Six months after ablation, the patient was asymptomatic and without ventricular ectopy. Discussion: For the first time, epicardial pulsed field ablation was successfully used for ablation of left ventricular summit extrasystole, where radiofrequency ablation could not be used because of the proximity of the coronary arteries. We conclude that pulsed field ablation might be a feasible option for this indication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.