Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39308911›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2024

Exploring librarians' practices when teaching advanced searching for knowledge synthesis: results from an online survey.

Glyneva Bradley-Ridout, Robin Parker, Lindsey Sikora, Andrea Quaiattini, Kaitlin Fuller, Margaret Nevison, Erica Nekolaichuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Glyneva Bradley-Ridoutglyneva.bradley.ridout@utoronto.ca, Liaison & Education Librarian, Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2879-9056
Robin Parkerrobin.parker@dal.ca, Evidence Synthesis Librarian, WK Kellogg Health Sciences Library, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8966-2785
Lindsey Sikoralindsey.sikora@uottawa.ca, Head (Health Sciences, Medicine and STEM), Health Sciences Library, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9715-8634
Andrea Quaiattiniandrea.quaiattini@mcgill.ca, Liaison Librarian, Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4977-060X
Kaitlin Fullerkfuller@stfx.ca, Scholarly Communications & Health Sciences Librarian, Angus L. Macdonald Library, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8315-187X
Margaret Nevisonm.nevison@mail.utoronto.ca, Graduate Student Library Assistant, Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Erica Nekolaichukerica.lenton@utoronto.ca, Faculty Liaison & Education Librarian, Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9392-2669

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: There is little research available regarding the instructional practices of librarians who support students completing knowledge synthesis projects. This study addresses this research gap by identifying the topics taught, approaches, and resources that academic health sciences librarians employ when teaching students how to conduct comprehensive searches for knowledge synthesis projects in group settings. Methods: This study applies an exploratory-descriptive design using online survey data collection. The final survey instrument included 31 open, closed, and frequency-style questions. Results: The survey received responses from 114 participants, 74 of whom met the target population. Some key results include shared motivations to teach in groups, including student learning and curriculum requirements, as well as popular types of instruction such as single session seminars, and teaching techniques, such as lectures and live demos. Conclusion: This research demonstrates the scope and coverage of librarian-led training in the knowledge synthesis research landscape. Although searching related topics such as Boolean logic were the most frequent, librarians report teaching throughout the review process like methods and reporting. Live demos and lectures were the most reported approaches to teaching, whereas gamification or student-driven learning were used rarely. Our results suggest that librarian's application of formal pedagogical approaches while teaching knowledge synthesis may be under-utilized, as most respondents did not report using any formal instructional framework.

Indexed as

LibrariansAdultCurriculumFemaleHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalLibraries, MedicalMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTeachingEvidence SynthesisLiterature Searchingteaching strategies

Identifiers

PMID39308911
PMCPMC11412128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.