Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39308907›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2024

Twenty-five years of Medical Library Association competencies and communities.

Stephanie Fulton, Gale G Hannigan, Rikke S Ogawa, Jodi L Philbrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stephanie Fultons-fulton@library.tamu.edu, Associate University Librarian for Health Sciences & Veterinary Medicine, University Libraries, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7543-3546
Gale G HanniganFormer Research Professor/Research Services Librarian, Health Sciences Library and Informatics Center, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5674-5787
Rikke S Ogawarsogawa@uci.edu, Assistant University Librarian for Public Services, UCI Libraries, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2681-8794
Jodi L PhilbrickJodi.Philbrick@unt.edu, Principal Lecturer, Department of Information Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8067-0885

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Professional associations provide resources to support members' career development and facilitate ways for members to engage with and learn from one another. This article describes Medical Library Association (MLA) activities related to the revision of professional competencies and the restructuring of the organization's communities during the past twenty-five years. Grounded in MLA's Platform for Change, the MLA competency statement underwent two revisions with core themes remaining consistent. Major efforts went into rethinking the structure of MLA communities, and it became a strategic goal of the association. Numerous groups spent considerable time guiding the changes in MLA's community structure. Sections and special interest groups were transformed into caucuses. Domain hubs were established to facilitate project coordination across caucuses and create more leadership opportunities for MLA members, but their implementation did not meet expectations. Member engagement and leadership are ongoing challenges for MLA. The next twenty-five years will undoubtedly see additional revisions to the competencies and continued iterations of the community structure.

Indexed as

Libraries, MedicalLibrary AssociationsProfessional CompetenceHumansLeadershipLibrariansUnited StatesHealth Information ProfessionalsMedical Library AssociationMLA competenciesOrganizational Change

Identifiers

PMID39308907
PMCPMC11412118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.