ArticleCureus2024
A Clinical Audit of Pregnancy Testing in Females Presenting With Abdominal Pain to the General Surgery Department of a District General Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Guidelines state that all female patients of childbearing age presenting with acute abdominal pain to a surgical department must have a pregnancy test with either urinary or serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (𝜷-HCG) testing. This allows complete evaluation of the patient and consideration of a wider range of differential diagnoses, including those that must not be missed, such as a possible ectopic pregnancy. Additionally, management options for conditions unrelated to pregnancy may differ in pregnant women. This audit assessed adherence to guidelines for pregnancy testing in females presenting with abdominal pain to the general surgery department in a district general hospital and the impact of initiatives to improve compliance. Methods A retrospective audit to identify pregnancy test completion of all female patients aged between 11 and 55 years presenting to the general surgery department at a district general hospital with acute abdominal pain in August 2022 was conducted. A medical education session, posters, and discussion amongst multidisciplinary team members in a nursing huddle followed to raise awareness. A subsequent prospective audit was conducted in November 2022. Results In the initial audit conducted in August 2022, 55 female patients aged between 11 and 55 years presented to the surgical department with abdominal pain. Of these patients, pregnancy testing was only completed for 41.8% (n = 23). Following interventions, a second audit conducted in November 2022 found 30 female patients presenting with abdominal pain. In this cohort, pregnancy testing was completed for 80% of patients (n = 24). Conclusion This study highlights the need for regular clinical audits and multidisciplinary discussion in improving and maintaining high standards of patient care and ensuring pregnancy testing of all females of reproductive age presenting with abdominal pain to the general surgery department. Further consideration may be given to the incorporation of recording of pregnancy test status on electronic healthcare systems as part of admission and mandatory checklists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.