ArticleSpartan medical research journal2024
Influence of Porosities of 3D Printed Titanium Implants on the Tensile Properties in a Rat Tendon Repair Model.
Article in Spartan medical research journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical Properties and Material Characteristics of 3D-Printed Titanium Capsules for Cancer Drug Delivery Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Influence of Porosities of 3D Printed Titanium Implants on the Tensile Properties: Correspondence.Spartan medical research journal · 2025Article
- Bridging Innovation and Clinical Insights: Reflections on Healthcare Research and Emergency Medicine.Spartan medical research journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a desire in orthopaedics to have soft tissue, particularly tendon, grow into metallic implants. With the introduction of three-dimensional (3D) printed porous metal implants, we hypothesized that tendons could directly attach to the implants. However, the effects of the porous metal structure on tissue growth and penetration into the pores are unknown. Using a rat model, we investigated the effect of pore size on tendon repair fixation using 3D printed titanium implants.
methodsThere were three experimental groups of eight Sprague Dawley rats (n = 24) plus control (n = 3). Implants had defined pore sizes of 400µm (n = 8), 700µm (n = 8), and 1000µm (n = 8). A defect was created in the Achilles tendon and the implant positioned between cut ends and secured with suture. Specimens were harvested at twelve weeks. Half the specimens underwent mechanical testing to assess tensile load to failure. The remaining specimens were fixed and processed for hard tissue histological analysis.
resultsThe average load to failure was 72.6N for controls (SD 10.04), 29.95N for 400µm (SD 17.95), 55.08N for 700µm (SD 13.47), and 63.08N for 1000µm (SD 1.87). The load to failure was generally better in the larger pore sizes. The 700µm and 1000µm specimens performed similarly, while the 400µm showed significant differences vs control (p = 0.039), vs 1000µm (p = 0.010), and approached significance vs 700µm (p = 0.066). There was increasing ingrowth as pore size increased. Histology showed fibrous tendon tissue within and around the implants, with collagen fibers organized in bundles.
conclusionsTendon repair utilizing implants with 700µm and 1000µm pores exhibited similar load to failure as controls. Using a defined pore structure at the attachment points of tendons to implants may allow predictable tendon ingrowth onto/into an implant at the time of revision arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.