Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39308760›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024

HarmonyTM: multi-center data harmonization applied to distributed learning for Parkinson's disease classification.

Raissa Souza, Emma A M Stanley, Vedant Gulve, Jasmine Moore, Chris Kang, Richard Camicioli, Oury Monchi, Zahinoor Ismail, Matthias Wilms, Nils D Forkert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Raissa SouzaUniversity of Calgary, Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7455-3383
Emma A M StanleyUniversity of Calgary, Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7802-6820
Vedant GulveIndian Institute of Technology, Department of Electronics and Electrical Communication Engineering, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India.
Jasmine MooreUniversity of Calgary, Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9333-2730
Chris KangUniversity of Calgary, Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Richard CamicioliUniversity of Alberta, Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute and Department of Medicine (Neurology), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Oury MonchiUniversity of Calgary, Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Zahinoor IsmailUniversity of Calgary, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5529-3731
Matthias WilmsUniversity of Calgary, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nils D ForkertUniversity of Calgary, Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2556-3224

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Distributed learning is widely used to comply with data-sharing regulations and access diverse datasets for training machine learning (ML) models. The traveling model (TM) is a distributed learning approach that sequentially trains with data from one center at a time, which is especially advantageous when dealing with limited local datasets. However, a critical concern emerges when centers utilize different scanners for data acquisition, which could potentially lead models to exploit these differences as shortcuts. Although data harmonization can mitigate this issue, current methods typically rely on large or paired datasets, which can be impractical to obtain in distributed setups. Approach: We introduced HarmonyTM, a data harmonization method tailored for the TM. HarmonyTM effectively mitigates bias in the model's feature representation while retaining crucial disease-related information, all without requiring extensive datasets. Specifically, we employed adversarial training to "unlearn" bias from the features used in the model for classifying Parkinson's disease (PD). We evaluated HarmonyTM using multi-center three-dimensional (3D) neuroimaging datasets from 83 centers using 23 different scanners. Results: Our results show that HarmonyTM improved PD classification accuracy from 72% to 76% and reduced (unwanted) scanner classification accuracy from 53% to 30% in the TM setup. Conclusion: HarmonyTM is a method tailored for harmonizing 3D neuroimaging data within the TM approach, aiming to minimize shortcut learning in distributed setups. This prevents the disease classifier from leveraging scanner-specific details to classify patients with or without PD-a key aspect for deploying ML models for clinical applications.

Indexed as

data harmonizationdistributed learningfederated learningshortcut learningtraveling model

Identifiers

PMID39308760
PMCPMC11413651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.