Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39308743›Full record

ReviewJPRAS open2024

Radiologic findings in women after Autologous Fat Transfer (AFT) based breast reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

M E P Rijkx, E Bernardi, S J Schop, E M Heuts, M B I Lobbes, J E Hommes, A Piatkowski de Grzymala, T J A van Nijnatten

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JPRAS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M E P RijkxDepartment of Plastic-, Reconstructive-, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
E BernardiDepartment of Plastic-, Reconstructive-, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
S J SchopDepartment of Plastic-, Reconstructive-, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
E M HeutsDepartment of General Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
M B I LobbesDepartment of Radiology, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J E HommesDepartment of Plastic-, Reconstructive-, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
A Piatkowski de GrzymalaDepartment of Plastic-, Reconstructive-, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
T J A van NijnattenDepartment of Radiology, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Autologous fat transfer (AFT) is increasingly used in breast reconstructive surgery. Due to post-surgical changes, in breast imaging after AFT, it can be challenging to differentiate between benign and suspicious findings. This systematic review aimed to present an overview of the literature on breast imaging after AFT-based breast reconstruction. The descriptive radiologic findings focus on different breast imaging modalities (i.e., mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) to provide an overview of the most commonly reported benign and suspicious findings. Results: The literature search yielded 20 studies from 2006-2022 that reported AFT-based breast reconstructions and included the radiologic evaluation of the included breast imaging modalities. Only six of the 20 included studies provided qualitative descriptions of radiologic findings. Fat necrosis was most frequently reported. On MG, fat necrosis was described in a variety of stages such as oil cyst or cytosteatonecrosis with or without calcifications. On US, it was described as a nonvascular hypo- or anechoic mass, and on breast MRI, it was most frequently reported as hypointense homogenous architectural distortion. Additional biopsies to differentiate between benign and malignant findings after AFT-based breast reconstruction were reported in 13 of the 20 studies. Among all included studies in the current review, a total of 34 of 137 biopsies were considered malignant (24.8%). Conclusion: Qualitative descriptions of the reported radiologic findings after AFT for breast reconstruction were limited. Additional biopsies can be considered to differentiate between benign and suspicious findings. More experience and research are necessary to improve the interpretation of breast imaging after AFT-based breast reconstructions.

Indexed as

Autologous Fat TransferBreast CancerBreast reconstructionBreast SurgeryLipofillingRadiology

Identifiers

PMID39308743
PMCPMC11416601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.