ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2024
2024 Update of the TSOC Expert Consensus of Fabry Disease.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progressive conduction system disease preceding hypertrophy in IVS4+919G>A Fabry variant: a population-based electrocardiographic study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Beneficial bystander-enhanced cryptic splice rescue of cardiac-type Fabry GLA IVS4+919G>A by adenine base editing in patient fibroblasts.Gene therapy · 2026Article
- Genetic Modifiers of Cardiac Remodeling Severity in IVS4+919G>A-Associated Fabry Cardiomyopathy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- 2026 Expert Consensus Recommendations on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the Task Force of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Neurological management and outcome measures in Fabry disease: consensus statements from the Italian Fabry disease neurological working group.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Integrated Glyco-Analytical Strategy for Comprehensive Characterization of a Complex Therapeutic Glycoprotein: Fabrazyme.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- AI-assisted longitudinal cardiac phenotyping identifies domain-specific remodeling patterns in Fabry cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Rationale, Objectives and Study Design of the Taiwan Registry of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (THIC).Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of agalsidase Beta (fabrazyme) in Chinese fabry disease patients with proteinuria: a case series.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Clinical and Biochemical Characterization of Fabry Disease Associated GLA Gene Variants: Data From a Large Cohort of 469 Thousand Genotyped Subjects of the UK Biobank Database.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Article
- Expert review in diagnostic, therapeutic and follow-up of Fabry disease in Latin America based on patient care standards.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2025Review
- Ten-Year Clinical Progression in a Patient with Fabry Disease: A Longitudinal Study.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As an X-linked inherited lysosomal storage disease that is caused by α-galactosidase A gene variants resulting in progressive accumulation of pathogenic glycosphingolipid (Gb3) accumulation in multiple tissues and organs, Fabry disease (FD) can be classified into classic or late-onset phenotypes. In classic phenotype patients, α-galactosidase A activity is absent or severely reduced, resulting in a more progressive disease course with multi-systemic involvement. Conversely, late-onset phenotype, often with missense variants (e.g., IVS4+919G>A) in Taiwan, may present with a more chronic clinical course with predominant cardiac involvement (cardiac subtype), as they tend to have residual enzyme activity, remaining asymptomatic or clinically silent during childhood and adolescence. In either form, cardiac hypertrophy remains the most common feature of cardiac involvement, potentially leading to myocardial fibrosis, arrhythmias, and heart failure. Diagnosis is established through α-galactosidase enzyme activity assessment or biomarker analyisis (globotriaosylsphingosine, Lyso-Gb3), advanced imaging modalities (echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging), and genotyping to differentiate FD from other cardiomyopathy. Successful therapeutic response relies on early recognition and by disease awareness from typical features in classic phenotype and cardiac red flags in cardiac variants for timely therapeutic interventions. Recent advances in pharmacological approach including enzyme replacement therapy (agalsidase alfa or beta), oral chaperone therapy (migalastat), and substrate reduction therapy (venglustat) aim to prevent from irreversible organ damage. Genotype- and gender-based monitoring of treatment effects through biomarker (Lyso-Gb3), renal assessment, and cardiac responses using advanced imaging modalities are key steps to optimizing patient care in FD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.