ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental urology2024
Steps toward identification of a novel cue-positive overactive bladder phenotype in women with high-bother urinary urgency.
Article in American journal of clinical and experimental urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sensation kinetics identifies novel bladder sensation-capacity curve shapes during urodynamics in patients with urinary urgency.Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between situational cues (running water, stress, cold, etc.) and overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms.
methodsWomen scheduled for urodynamic studies for clinical indications completed surveys to characterize OAB (ICIQ-OAB and OAB-V3) and responses to situational cues (validated long-form cues survey and a novel short-form cues survey). Participants were divided into two groups (Low-Bother urgency vs. High-Bother urgency), and OAB and cue survey responses were compared.
resultsA total of 47 participants were enrolled in the study with 36 meeting inclusion criteria (15 Low-Bother and 21 High-Bother) with an overall mean age of 60.0 ± 10.0 years. The High-Bother urgency group scored significantly higher on multiple cue items in the long-form (P<0.05) and only "running water" in the short-form cues survey (P<0.05). In addition, "running water" was the only cue that was scored higher in both surveys (P<0.05).
conclusionsThis study showed that patients with High-Bother urgency may have increased symptom responses to environmental, mood, and cognitive cues. These findings suggest increased sensitivity to cues, especially "running water" in participants with bothersome OAB and the potential presence of a cue-specific OAB phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.