Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39308547›Full record

ReviewBioactive materials2024

Enhancing biocompatibility of the brain-machine interface: A review.

Jordan Villa, Joaquin Cury, Lexie Kessler, Xiaodong Tan, Claus-Peter Richter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioactive materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tissue-bioelectronics interfaces.Chemical Society reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Smart Nanotechnologies for Multimodal Neuromodulation and Brain Interfacing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Method for in Situ Interfacial pH Detection.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jordan VillaNorthwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, USA.
Joaquin CuryNorthwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, USA.
Lexie KesslerNorthwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, USA.
Xiaodong TanNorthwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, USA.
Claus-Peter RichterNorthwestern University-Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, USA.

Funding

Opto-Electrical Cochlear ImplantsR01DC018666 · NIDCD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI RICHTER, CLAUS-PETER · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo implantation of microelectrodes opens the door to studying neural circuits and restoring damaged neural pathways through direct electrical stimulation and recording. Although some neuroprostheses have achieved clinical success, electrode material properties, inflammatory response, and glial scar formation at the electrode-tissue interfaces affect performance and sustainability. Those challenges can be addressed by improving some of the materials' mechanical, physical, chemical, and electrical properties. This paper reviews materials and designs of current microelectrodes and discusses perspectives to advance neuroprosthetics performance.

Indexed as

Brain-machine interfaceElectrode coatingsImmune reactionImplantable devicesNeuroprostheses

Identifiers

PMID39308547
PMCPMC11416625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.