Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39308535›Full record

ArticleGastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench2024

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an index of treatment response to trans-arterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Neda Shayegan, Niloofar Ayoobi, Esmaeil Mohammadi, Hajir Saberi, Faeze Salahshour, Forough Alborzi, Fateme Ziamanesh, Nahid Sadighi, Mohammad Taher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Neda ShayeganDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Niloofar AyoobiDepartment of Radiology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Esmaeil MohammadiDepartment of Radiology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hajir SaberiAdvanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Faeze SalahshourDepartment of Radiology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Forough AlborziDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fateme ZiamaneshDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nahid SadighiDepartment of Radiology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad TaherDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: We evaluated the response to Trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria. We determined the prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Background: TACE is the most commonly used method to treat patients with large, unresectable tumors or as bridge therapy in patients with HCC before liver transplantation. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients with a diagnosis of HCC who were referred for TACE were studied. The response rate to TACE treatment was assessed based on dynamic MRI 28 days after treatment according to mRECIST criteria. The NLR value was calculated, and its prognostic value was evaluated to predict the response to treatment. Results: Forty patients with HCC who underwent TACE were included. The response to TACE treatment included a complete response (CR) in 6 patients (15%), partial response (PR) in 16 patients (40%), and stable disease (SD) in 18 patients (45%). No progressive disease (PD) was found. Responders (CR and PR) were 22 patients (55%). The mean NLR after treatment in the non-responders was significantly higher than in the responders (4.2 vs. 2.4, P-value = 0.026). NLR values greater than 2.6 after treatment had a sensitivity of 70.6% and a specificity of 77.3% in diagnosing non-responders, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.73 [95% confidence interval 0.58-0.89], P-value = 0.011. Conclusion: Non-responders observed higher levels of NLR after treatment than responders. As a moderate prognostic factor, an NLR level of more than 2.6 after treatment could discriminate against non-responders.

Indexed as

Hepatocellular carcinomaLiver transplantationTherapeutic chemoembolization

Identifiers

PMID39308535
PMCPMC11413382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.