Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39308471›Full record

ArticleThe Neurohospitalist2024

Differences in Interfacility Transfer from Emergency Department and Inpatient Services for Inpatient Neurologic Care.

Maulik P Shah, Anne G Douglas, Brian M Sauer, Megan B Richie, Vanja C Douglas, S Andrew Josephson, Elan L Guterman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Neurohospitalist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maulik P ShahDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0261-7054
Anne G DouglasDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6877-8974
Brian M SauerDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Megan B RichieDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Vanja C DouglasDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
S Andrew JosephsonDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Elan L GutermanDepartment of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Interhospital transfer is an important mechanism for improving access to specialized neurologic care but there are large gaps in our understanding of interhospital transfer for the management of non-stroke-related neurologic disease. Methods: This observational study included consecutive patients admitted to an adult academic general neurology service via interhospital transfer from July 1, 2015 to July 1, 2017. Characteristics of the referring hospital and transferred patients were obtained through the American Hospital Association Directory, a hospital transfer database maintained by the accepting hospital, and the electronic medical record. The analyses used descriptive statistics to examine the cohort overall and compare characteristics of patients transferred from an emergency department and inpatient service. Results: 504 patients were admitted via interhospital transfer during the study period. Of these, 395 patients (78.4%) were transferred because the referring hospital lacked capability, and 139 patients (27.6%) were transferred from an emergency department as opposed to inpatient service. Seizures was the most common diagnosis (23.8%). Patients who were transferred from an emergency department had a higher proportion covered by Medicaid (44.6%) than those transferred from an inpatient service (28.8%) and had a shorter median length of stay (3 days; IQR 2-7 vs 7 days; IQR 4-12). Conclusions: The majority of observed interhospital non-stroke neurologic transfers occurred to improve access to specialized neurological care for patients, though patients transferred from the ED, as opposed to an inpatient service, had lower health care utilization, and this will be important to consider when developing systems of care and in future research.

Indexed as

electroencephalography < techniquesinterhospital transferneurohospitalist < clinical specialtyneurology health services researchoutcomes < techniquesstatus epilepticus < epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID39308471
PMCPMC11412452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.