ReviewCirculation. Heart failure2024
Prediction of Donor Heart Acceptance for Transplant and Its Clinical Implications: Results From The Donor Heart Study.
Review in Circulation. Heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- International Utah Cardiac Recovery Symposium (U-CARS) 2025: Clinical Science Proceedings.Heart failure reviews · 2026Article
- Modernizing the national transplant database.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025Review
- Reasons for donor heart offer refusal are often unrelated to the donor itself - when, why, and the "weekend effect".The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025Observational
- Reasons for donor heart offer refusal in the United States: Results from 14,132 transplant clinician surveys in the Donor Heart Study.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025Observational
- Gap between availability and utilization of cardiac donors: analysis of determining factors in Ecuador.Archivos peruanos de cardiologia y cirugia cardiovascularArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite a shortage of potential donors for heart transplant in the United States, most potential donor hearts are discarded. We evaluated predictors of donor heart acceptance in the United States and applied machine learning methods to improve prediction.
methodsWe included a nationwide (2005-2020) cohort of potential heart donors in the United States (n=73 948) from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and a more recent (2015-2020) rigorously phenotyped cohort of potential donors from DHS (Donor Heart Study; n=4130). We identified predictors of acceptance for heart transplant in both cohorts using multivariate logistic regression, incorporating time-interaction terms to characterize their varying effects over time. We fit models predicting acceptance for transplant in a 50% training subset of DHS using logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and random forest algorithms and compared their performance in the remaining 50% (test) of the subset.
resultsPredictors of donor heart acceptance were similar in the nationwide and DHS cohorts. Among these, older age (
conclusionsPredictors of donor heart acceptance for transplantation have changed significantly over the last 2 decades, likely reflecting evolving evidence regarding their impact on posttransplant outcomes. Real-time prediction of donor heart acceptance, using our web-based tool, may improve efficiency during donor management and heart allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.