ArticleBJPsych open2024
Characteristics of high-dose benzodiazepine use: nationwide cohort study on new benzodiazepine users with 5-year follow-up.
Article in BJPsych open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benzodiazepine Use and Mortality Risk: A Nationwide Cohort Study on New Benzodiazepine Users With a 5-Year Follow-Up.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Characteristics of high-dose benzodiazepine use: nationwide cohort study on new benzodiazepine users with 5-year follow-up - ADDENDUM.BJPsych open · 2025Article
- Long-Term Use of Benzodiazepines and Related Drugs in Persons With Major Depressive Disorder.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA nationwide register-based cohort study from Finland including 48 124 incident benzodiazepines and related drug (BZDR) users aged 18-65 years who initiated use in 2006 and were not dispensed BZDRs during 2004-2005. The follow-up was 5 years or until death, whichever occurred first.
aimsTo investigate sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with high-dose use of BZDRs (i.e. Z-drugs) among new BZDR users.
methodThe temporal BZDR dose was calculated as a point estimate every 6 months after initiation as defined daily doses (DDDs) per day, based on the PRE2DUP method (an approach based on mathematical modelling of personal drug purchasing behaviours). Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with dose categories were studied using multinomial logistic regression.
resultsDuring the 5-year follow-up, very high-dose BZDR use was observed in 7.4% (
conclusionsClinicians should be aware of the dose escalation risk especially when prescribing diazepam, alprazolam or clonazepam for psychiatric indications. If BZDRs are needed, our findings suggest favouring oxazepam.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.