Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39308215›Full record

ArticleLaboratory animals2024

Guidance on the assessment of learning outcomes for those designing procedures and projects - Report of an ETPLAS Working Group.

Ismene A Dontas, Derek J Fry, David I Lewis, Kenneth Applebee, Martje Fentener van Vlissingen, Katerina Marinou, Johannes Schenkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory animals, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Long-Term Experiences of Basic Education in Laboratory Animal Science.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ismene A DontasLaboratory for Research of the Musculoskeletal System, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-2440-0119
Derek J FrySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
David I LewisSchool of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3014-3427
Kenneth ApplebeeApplebee Advisory Ltd, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7714-215X
Martje Fentener van VlissingenErasmus Laboratory Animal Science Centre, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Katerina MarinouMinistry of Rural Development and Food, Athens, Greece.
Johannes SchenkelGerman Cancer Research Centre and Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, University of Heidelberg, FR Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3326-1130

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This document provides assessment criteria for evaluation of each of the Learning Outcomes of the Modules specified (in addition to the Core Modules) for those designing procedures and projects in the Education and Training Framework guidance document by the European Commission and endorsed by the Member States Competent Authorities. This Working Group was tasked to produce these criteria by the Education & Training Platform for Laboratory Animal Science, which was funded by the European Commission to this aim. The assessment criteria address knowledge and skills (including critical thinking) expected to be acquired during education and training of persons preparing to design research procedures and projects using animals under the scope of Directive 2010/63/EU. Recognizing the diversity of expertise and experiences of those being educated and trained, we provide two levels of attainment, an ideal response and one that would be acceptable for each Learning Outcome. The balance between ideal and acceptable could be decided by the particular course providers and/or assessors, according to their local requirements. We envisage that the use of these assessment criteria by training providers and accrediting or approving bodies will help harmonize the education and training for those who will design procedures and projects using animals for scientific purposes. In Europe, this may also contribute to mutual recognition of training, and facilitate free movement of scientists.

Indexed as

Laboratory Animal ScienceAnimalsEuropean UnionLearningAssessment criteriaDirective 2010/63/EUeducation and trainingexperimental designlearning outcomesproceduresprojects

Identifiers

PMID39308215
PMCPMC11633073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.