Trial reportPharmacology research & perspectives2024
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the factor XIa-inhibiting antibody osocimab in healthy male East Asian volunteers: Results from two phase 1 studies.
Trial report in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the factor XIa-inhibiting antibody osocimab in healthy male East Asian volunteers: Results from two phase 1 studies.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2024Trial
- Factor XI(a) Inhibition in Secondary Stroke Prevention: On the Cusp of a New Anticoagulation Paradigm.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Article
- Factor XI Inhibition for Ischemic Stroke Secondary Prevention: Pharmacology, Clinical Evidence, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety of osocimab single doses in healthy Chinese and Japanese volunteers over 149 days were evaluated. Two phase 1 single-blinded, placebo-controlled studies with 27 Japanese and 50 Chinese participants were conducted. Osocimab was investigated with IV doses of 0.3, 1.25, and 2.5 mg/kg (Chinese study) and 0.3, 1.25, and 5.0 mg/kg (Japanese study), as well as SC doses of 3.0 and 6.0 mg/kg (Chinese study) and 6.0 mg/kg (Japanese study). The maximum plasma concentration was reached 1-3 h and 4-6 days after IV and SC administration, respectively. Osocimab exhibited a deviation from dose-proportional pharmacokinetics for AUC but not C
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.