Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39308029›Full record

ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2025

Physician Level Assessment of Hirsute Women and of Their Eligibility for Laser Treatment With Deep Learning.

Kenneth Thomsen, Raluca Jalaboi, Ole Winther, Hans Bredsted Lomholt, Henrik F Lorentzen, Trine Høgsberg, Henrik Egekvist, Lene Hedelund, Sofie Jørgensen, Sanne Frost and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kenneth ThomsenDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2337-7746
Raluca JalaboiDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Ole WintherDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Hans Bredsted LomholtClinical Institute, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Henrik F LorentzenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Trine HøgsbergDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Henrik EgekvistHudlaege Henrik Egekvist, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lene HedelundHudlaegeklinikken Hobro, Hobro, Denmark.
Sofie JørgensenDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sanne FrostDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Trine BertelsenDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lars IversenDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

This project was funded by Helse fonden, Sundhedsinnovationsfonden Region Midt, and the Danish psoriasis foundation.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesHirsutism is a widespread condition affecting 5%-15% of females. Laser treatment of hirsutism has the best long-term effect. Patients with nonpigmented or nonterminal hairs are not eligible for laser treatment, and the current patient journey needed to establish eligibility for laser hair removal is problematic in many health-care systems.

methodsIn this study, we compared the ability to assess eligibility for laser hair removal of health-care professionals and convolutional neural network (CNN)-based models.

resultsThe CNN ensemble model, synthesized from the outputs of five individual CNN models, reached an eligibility assessment accuracy of 0.52 (95% CI: 0.42-0.60) and a κ of 0.20 (95% CI: 0.13-0.27), taking a consensus expert label as reference. For comparison, board-certified dermatologists achieved a mean accuracy of 0.48 (95% CI: 0.44-0.52) and a mean κ of 0.26 (95% CI: 0.22-0.31). Intra-rater analysis of board-certified dermatologists yielded κ in the 0.32 (95% CI: 0.24-0.40) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56-0.74) range.

conclusionCurrent assessment of eligibility for laser hair removal is challenging. Developing a laser hair removal eligibility assessment tool based on deep learning that performs on a par with trained dermatologists is feasible. Such a model may potentially reduce workload, increase quality and effectiveness, and facilitate equal health-care access. However, to achieve true clinical generalizability, prospective randomized clinical intervention studies are needed.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDermatologistsEligibility DeterminationHair RemovalHirsutismLaser TherapyAdultFemaleHumansartificial intelligencedeep learningdermatologyendocrinologyFerriman–Gallwey scorehirsutismlaser hair removalPCOS

Identifiers

PMID39308029
PMCPMC11776445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.