ArticleWorld journal of surgery2024
The clinicopathological landscape of thyroid cancer in South Africa-A multi-institutional review.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer Stemness and Dedifferentiation in Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma: Insights into a Multigenic, Microenvironmental Network and the Role of CD44.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Diverging spatiotemporal trajectories of thyroid cancer incidence and mortality in reproductive-age women: a socio-demographic index stratified analysis of GBD 2021 data.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- CD44 Variant Expression in Follicular Cell-Derived Thyroid Cancers: Implications for Overcoming Multidrug Resistance.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Building foundations: Invited commentary: The clinicopathological landscape of thyroid cancer in South Africa: A multi-institutional review.World journal of surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn South Africa (SA), data on the incidence of thyroid cancer is limited. Papillary thyroid carcinoma is by far the most common malignancy in developed countries; however, a preponderance of follicular thyroid cancer in developing countries, despite iodized salt, has been observed. The aim of this study was to describe the national landscape of thyroid cancer in SA with reference to pathological subtypes, surgical outcomes, and treatments offered.
methodsA multi-institutional retrospective review of thyroid cancer patients operated on between January 2015 and December 2019 was performed. Public hospitals with associated academic institutions were included. Data were collected from theater registers, pathology, and radiology records. Statistical analysis was done to determine intergroup significance.
resultsA total of 464 thyroid cancer cases from 13 centers across five SA provinces were identified. Most patients presented with a mass (67%). Ultrasound was performed in 82% of patients, and 16.3% underwent surgery without pre-operative cytology. Of the histologically confirmed thyroid cancers, 61.8% were papillary and 22.1% follicular thyroid cancer. There was a significant association between subtype and geographical area, and T-stage and operation performed. Surgical complication rates included hematoma in 1.8%, post-operative hypocalcemia in 28.7%, and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in 3.5%.
conclusionThis first national review describes the landscape of thyroid cancer in SA, revealing considerable differences compared to international studies. It provides valuable insight into the unique South African experience with this disease. In addition, this study serves as an impetus towards a prospective national registry with real-world data informing contextualized guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.