ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025
Development and validation of an algorithm to predict stillbirth gestational age in Medicaid billing records.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of gestational age by pregnancy outcomes and distribution of pregnancy-related codes in Korean claims data.Epidemiology and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With Medicaid covering half of US pregnancies, Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) provides a valuable data source to enrich understanding about stillbirth etiologies. We developed and validated a claims-based algorithm to predict gestational age (GA) at stillbirth. We linked the stillbirths identified in MAX 1999-2013 to Florida fetal death records (FDRs) to obtain clinical estimates of GA (n = 825). We tested several algorithms, including using a fixed median GA, median GA at the time of specific prenatal screening tests, and expanded versions considering additional predictors of stillbirth, including linear regression and random forest models. We estimated the proportion of pregnancies with differences of ±1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks between the predicted and FDR GA and the model mean square error (MSE). We validated the selected algorithms in 2 external samples. The best performing algorithm was a random forest model (MSE, 12.67 weeks2) with 84% of GAs within ±4 weeks. Assigning a fixed GA of 28 weeks resulted in an MSE of 60.21 weeks2 and proportions of GA within ±4 weeks of 32%. We observed consistent results in the external samples. Our prediction algorithm for stillbirths can facilitate pregnancy research in the Medicaid population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.