Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39307168›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2024

Towards a unified carbon accounting landscape.

Lewis J McDonald, Jose Luis Hernandez Galvan, Chukwudi Emelue, Ariane S S Pinto, Neha Mehta, Taofeeq Ibn-Mohammed, Thomas Fender, Jonathan Radcliffe, Alok Choudhary, Marcelle C McManus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lewis J McDonaldInstitute for Sustainability, University of Bath , Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Jose Luis Hernandez GalvanInstitute for Sustainability, University of Bath , Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Chukwudi EmelueInstitute for Sustainability, University of Bath , Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Ariane S S PintoInstitute for Sustainability, University of Bath , Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Neha MehtaBirmingham Energy Institute, University of Birmingham , Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Taofeeq Ibn-MohammedWMG, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Thomas FenderBirmingham Energy Institute, University of Birmingham , Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Jonathan RadcliffeBirmingham Energy Institute, University of Birmingham , Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Alok ChoudharyWMG, University of Warwick , Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Marcelle C McManusInstitute for Sustainability, University of Bath , Bath BA2 7AY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0685-8695

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overarching purpose of carbon accounting is to reduce carbon emissions to meet net-zero targets and minimize the impact of climate change. However, the plethora of methods and approaches used means that products and systems sometimes cannot easily be compared. The mix of regional and life cycle-based systems can mean that we lack global oversight of our emissions and impact. In some situations where a regional approach is used, industry/business/regions are incentivized to reduce their own/territorial emissions, which can mean that an optimal global solution is not adopted. Countries where grid emissions are higher can be selected for production because it reduces regional (not global) carbon levels. Furthermore, these can be areas where the climate impact may be felt the most: not the just transition we aspire to. Our work provides an analysis of the current system together with its challenges and limitations, paving the way towards a more unified framework to create climate justice together with transparent and comparable accounting methodology for industry and regions alike. This article is part of the discussion meeting issue 'Green carbon for the chemical industry of the future'.

Indexed as

carboncircular-economyclimate-justiceglobal-emissionslife cycle

Identifiers

PMID39307168
PMCPMC11448835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.