Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39307001›Full record

SynthesisHeart & lung : the journal of critical care

Understanding attendance patterns and determinants in cardiac, pulmonary, and ICU rehabilitation/recovery programs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Leanne M Boehm, Kelly Potter, Joanne McPeake, Martin Shaw, Han Su, Abigail C Jones, Valerie Renard, Tammy L Eaton, Carl Boethel, Javed Butler and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Heart & lung : the journal of critical care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Beyond Survival: Lessons From a Research Journey in Critical Care Recovery Science.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Language Barriers and Other Determinants of Post-Intensive Care Unit Follow-Up: A 5-Year Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Sociodemographic representation in ICU recovery research.Intensive & critical care nursing · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Leanne M BoehmSchool of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Critical Illness, Brain dysfunction, and Survivorship Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: leanne.boehm@vanderbilt.edu.
Kelly PotterCenter for Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA), Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: kelly.potter@pitt.edu.
Joanne McPeakeThe Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: jm2565@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Martin ShawDepartment of Clinical Physics, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK. Electronic address: Martin.shaw@ggc.scot.nhs.uk.
Han SuSchool of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: han.su@vanderiblt.edu.
Abigail C JonesSchool of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: abigail.c.jones@vanderbilt.edu.
Valerie RenardSchool of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Hospital Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: valerie.j.renard@vanderbilt.edu.
Tammy L EatonVA Health Services Research & Development, Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. Electronic address: tameat@med.umich.edu.
Carl BoethelDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, USA. Electronic address: Carl.Boethel@BSWHealth.org.
Javed ButlerDepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA; Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA. Electronic address: butlzih@gmail.com.
Rachel Lane WaldenVanderbilt University, Eskind Biomedical Library, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: rachel.l.walden@vanderbilt.edu.
Valerie DaneshCenter for Applied Health Research, Baylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, TX, USA; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: Valerie.Danesh@BSWHealth.org.

Funding

Telehealth-Enhanced Patient-Oriented Recovery Trajectory After Intensive CareR01AG077644 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Leanne M Boehm · 2023 to 2026
$3.1M
Driving Rehabilitation and Innovation for Evaluating Risk in Post-Intensive Care Unit Survivors (DRIVE-PICS)R21AG080339 · NIA · BAYLOR RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DANESH, VALERIE, MCDONALD, ANTHONY D. · 2023 to 2024
$457k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG077644NIA NIH HHS R21 AG080339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac, pulmonary, and intensive care unit (ICU) rehabilitation/recovery programs are health promotion interventions designed to improve physical recovery, psychological well-being, and quality of life after acute illness while reducing the risk of adverse events.

objectiveIdentify the difference in attendance rates for patients invited to a cardiac rehabilitation, pulmonary rehabilitation, or ICU recovery program and factors influencing attendance.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and manual reference lists from inception to June 3, 2024. We included studies reporting patient attendance rates in eligible programs following acute illness hospitalization. Two team members independently screened articles and extracted data, with a third member reviewing and achieving consensus when necessary. Our main outcomes focused on the proportion of attendance in eligible programs among patients referred.

resultsOf 3,446 studies screened, 179 studies (N = 4,779,012 patients) were included across cardiac rehabilitation (n = 153 studies), pulmonary rehabilitation (n = 11 studies), and ICU recovery (n = 15 studies) programs. Pooled attendance rates were 53 % (95 % CI: 48-57 %) for cardiac rehabilitation, 56 % (95 % CI: 42-70 %) for pulmonary rehabilitation, and 61 % (95 % CI: 51-70 %) for ICU recovery programs. Significant attendance heterogeneity was present (cardiac I

conclusionsThe results indicate comparable attendance rates and factors shaping attendance across acute illness rehabilitation/recovery programs, with ICU recovery programs being the most well-attended on average. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022357261.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationIntensive Care UnitsHumansLung DiseasesQuality of LifeAttendanceCardiac rehabilitationCritical careImplementation sciencePost-intensive care syndrome (PICS)Pulmonary rehabilitationRecoverySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39307001
PMCPMC11598641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.