Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39306749›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric and mental health nursing2025

Strengthening Relationships Within Intensive Psychiatric Care: Staff Perceptions of an Attachment Training Intervention.

Aiden Duffy, Karen Goodall, David Carmichael, Sean Harper, Katy Sivyer, Kathy Carnelley, Tess Maguire, Katherine Newman-Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aiden DuffyUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4444-3343
Karen GoodallUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David CarmichaelNHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Sean HarperNHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.
Katy SivyerUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Kathy CarnelleyUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Tess MaguireUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Katherine Newman-TaylorUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntensive psychiatric care units can be challenging environments in which to build strong staff-patient relationships. Attachment theory may provide a useful model for strengthening relationships in this setting.

aimThe aim of this study was to explore staff perceptions of the utility of attachment theory for understanding patient behaviour in the intensive psychiatric care setting.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 multi-disciplinary staff members. Interviews focused on the staff member's experience of learning about attachment theory and applying this perspective to their work on the ward. Transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsThe analysis led to the development of three themes: engaging the reflective self, new perspective on others and cohesive ward culture.

conclusionStaff reported that learning about attachment theory supported them to better understand patient distress and associated behaviours. Notably, staff also used attachment theory to reflect on both their own internal states and the internal states of their colleagues. These reflections were suggested to bolster staff wellbeing and improve the ward milieu. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Integrating attachment theory into team formulation, ward rounds and reflective practice groups could have a benefit for clinical practice, staff wellbeing and team cohesion in this setting.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelObject AttachmentProfessional-Patient RelationsPsychiatric Department, HospitalAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchattachmentinpatientpsychosisqualitativestaff

Identifiers

PMID39306749
PMCPMC11891429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.