Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39306632›Full record

Trial reportJournal of behavioral medicine2024

The physical activity in cancer survivors (PACES) trial: a factorial randomized trial to optimize intervention for breast cancer survivors.

Chad D Rethorst, Thomas J Carmody, Keith E Argenbright, Louis Vazquez, Thomas DeLuca, Taryn L Mayes, Heidi A Hamann, Madhukar H Trivedi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Recreational physical activity and health-related quality of life among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chad D RethorstInstitute for Advancing Health Through Agriculture, Texas A&M Agrilife Research, 17360 Coit Road, Dallas, TX, 75252, US. chad.rethorst@ag.tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8168-2829
Thomas J CarmodyDepartment of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, US.
Keith E ArgenbrightMoncrief Cancer Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX Fort Worth, TX, US.
Louis VazquezDepartment of Statistical Science, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USA.
Thomas DeLucaFresenius Medical Care, Waltham, MA, US.
Taryn L MayesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Heidi A HamannDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, US.
Madhukar H TrivediDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas PP160121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple intervention strategies have been found effective for increasing physical activity among breast cancer survivors, yet most breast cancer survivors fail to meet physical activity recommendations. Optimization of interventions can facilitate real word implementation to ensure effective and efficient intervention delivery. Using a full-factorial design based on the Multiphase Optimization Strategy, 337 breast cancer survivors were randomized to receive a combination of four intervention components: (1) supervised exercise sessions, (2) facility membership, (3) Active Living Every Day (ALED), and (4) Fitbit. Moderate-to vigorous (MVPA) and light-intensity physical activity (LPA) were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months with a hip-worn Actigraph GT3X+. Normal linear mixed models with separate intercepts for each subject were fit in the SAS 9.4 Mixed procedure. Participants who received supervised exercise sessions engaged in more MVPA, 153.58 min/week vs. 133.0 min/week (F = 3.97, p = 0.048) and LPA, 170.26 min/day versus 160.98 light PA minutes/day (F = 4.67, p = 0.032), compared to participants who did not receive supervised exercise. The effects of the three other intervention components on MVPA were not significant; however, those that received ALED engaged in less LPA (F = 6.6, p = 0.011). Supervised exercise sessions resulted in significant increases in MVPA and LPA in a sample of breast cancer survivors. Of note, these sessions were provided only during the first 6 weeks of the intervention and effects remained significant at 6 months. Results of this trial could inform future implementation efforts to ensure effective and efficient delivery of physical activity programs for breast cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsExerciseAdultAgedExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedBreast cancerCancer survivorsExerciseMultiphase optimization strategyPhysical activity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.