Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39306607›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

Urosepsis after ureterorenoscopy, intraoperative recognition of type-IV stones could change clinical practice.

Maxime Pattou, Laurent Yonneau, Amaury de Gouvello, Christophe Almeras, Christian Saussine, Andras Hoznek, Etienne Denis, Eric Chabannes, Eric Lechevallier, Nadia Abid and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maxime PattouLouis University Hospital, Paris, France. maxime.pattou@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5946-1771
Laurent YonneauFoch University Hospital, Suresnes, France.
Amaury de GouvelloLouis University Hospital, Paris, France.
Christophe AlmerasCroix du Sud Private Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France.
Christian SaussineJoseph University Hospital, Lyon, France.
Andras HoznekMondor University Hospital, Créteil, France.
Etienne DenisEdouard Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France.
Eric ChabannesBesançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.
Eric LechevallierMarseille University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Nadia AbidStrasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
Jacques HubertNancy-Brabois University Hospital, Vandœuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.
Vincent EstradeBordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Paul MeriaLouis University Hospital, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesUrosepsis currently accounts for half of all post flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) complications, with an incidence of up to 4.3%. It represents a quarter of all septic episodes in adults and 2% of hospital spendings. The primary objective of this study was to define the predictive clinical parameters that increase the risk of urosepsis after F-URS. SUBJECTS/PATIENTS (OR MATERIALS) AND

methodsThis prospective multicentric study evaluated patients who underwent F-URS for calculus between June 2016 and June 2018 in eleven French centers. Clinical, bacteriological, morpho-constitutional stone data, intraoperative information and complications were compared. Risk factors for postoperative urosepsis were identified and analyzed.

resultsWe included 486 F-URS in 432 patients. The ureter was prepared using a double J stent in 51% of cases, a digital endoscope was used in 56% of patients with a median operative time of 120 min IQR (90-125) and using a sheath in 90% of cases. Postoperative urosepsis was observed in 18 patients (4%) with a median time to onset of 2 days IQR (1-5). The presence of coronary insufficiency: 3 (17%) vs 14 (3%) p = 0.005, a larger stone diameter: 11 cm [9-17] vs 10 cm [8-13] p = 0.02, a positive preoperative urine culture even when treated: 3 (17%) vs 56 (12%) p = 0.04, as well as the final composition of the type IV calculus (carbapatite or struvite) 5 (28%) vs 20 (4%) p < 0.001, were significantly associated with the occurrence of urosepsis. In multivariate analysis, only the presence of a type IV stone (OR = 14.0; p = 0.025) remained significant.

conclusionUreteroscopic treatment of a type IV stone (carbapatite or struvite) in a patient should raise concerns about the risk of post-operative urosepsis. When recognized intraoperatively, they should lead to a pyelic urinary sample and prolonged clinical surveillance.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiPostoperative ComplicationsSepsisUreteroscopyUrinary Tract InfectionsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUreteral CalculiCarbapatiteRenal stoneStone compositionStruviteUreterorenoscopyUrosepsis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.