SynthesisInternational dental journal2025
Anterior Endocrowns as An Alternative to Core Crown restorations: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International dental journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of endocrown design modification on retention & microleakage: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- In-vitro comparison of fracture resistance and failure patterns of endocrowns versus post-and-core restorations in maxillary central incisors with and without ferrule.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparison of Fracture Resistance Based on Ferrule Presence vs Material Type in Maxillary Central Incisor Endocrown Restorations.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Load-Bearing Capacity of Incisors Restored Using Fiber-Reinforced Composite Post-Core Systems.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Restoring extensively damaged endodontically treated teeth presents a challenging task due to the state of biomechanical deterioration affecting long-term prognosis. Therefore, the study aims to assess and compare the biomechanical performance of endocrowns and post core-crown restorations in anterior endodontically treated teeth with severe coronal structure loss. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for articles published from January 2014 to March 2024. Two independent reviewers screened and selected studies based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The included studies were analyzed using the QUIN tool for risk of bias assessment in in-vitro studies. Additionally, the biomechanical outcomes were collected for qualitative comparative analysis. Twelve studies were included in this systematic review. In most studies, Endocrowns demonstrated comparable fatigue resistance under load to failure to post core-crown restorations. Endocrowns without ferrule exhibited a higher rate of debonding but had significantly more repairable failures. Conversely, post core-crown restorations demonstrated higher fracture resistance with the presence of ferrule, but were associated with more catastrophic failure patterns. Additionally, endocrowns generated lower stress levels in both the restorative material and the luting material compared to post core-crown restorations. Among the tested materials, lithium disilicate ceramics provided the best biomechanical properties. Overall, the studies included provided sufficient information for most evaluation criteria of the QUIN risk of bias assessment tool. Endocrowns are a viable and conservative approach for restoring endodontically treated anterior teeth, offering comparable biomechanical performance to traditional post core-crown restorations and less catastrophic failures. The findings of this systematic review suggest that endocrown restorations, especially with lithium disilicate ceramics and proper ferrule design, can improve fracture resistance and longevity of rehabilitated teeth, enhancing patient outcomes for severely damaged anterior endodontically treated teeth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.